Improving the Students’ Writing Ability in Using Narrative paragraph through Arias (Assurance-Relevance-Interest-Assessment-Satisfaction) Model at the Second year) Students of SMA Kartika Wirabuana XX-I Makassar (A Classroom Action Research)
The research questions of this research “How is the improvement of tha students’ writing abillity to identify the content of narrative paragraph through through ARIAS model at the second yaear students of SMA Kartika Wirabuana XX-I Makassar?, How is the improvement the students’ writing ability to identify the organization of narrative paragraph through ARIAS Model at the second year students of SMA Kartika Wirabuana XX-I Makassar ?
How is the implementation of ARIAS model to improve the students’ writing ability to write narrative paragraph at the second year students of SMA Kartika Wirabuana XX-I Makassar ?
The researcher used A Classroom Action Research (CAR). The aims at this research is to find out the improvement of students’ writing skill and their activeness in learning process through Arias Model. Two cycles had been conducted, where each cycle consisted of four meetings. It employed writing test as instrument. A number of subjects of the research were 40 students in the second year students of II IPA 3 that conducted of 31 women and 9 men. The researcher took real data from the school to know the students’ writing skill.
The results of the student's writing test in cycle 1 and cycle 2 had increased in different scores. There was increasing Got by students at the end action of cycle II. The research findings indicated that use of Arias Model could increase the students’ writing skill. The means scores of students in Diagnostic test was 58.84 became 60.71 in cycle 1, and after revision in the cycle 2 the Students score in cycle 2 was 64.37 implemented of Narrative text. The successful of minimal criteria (KKM) was 60 while cycle 1, there were 13 (32.5%) students get poor, 27(67%) get fair, means that students who achieved the successful minimal criteria (KKM) more than a half of them. In cycle 2 there was 4 (10%) got poor and 36 (90%) got fair.
